Genting Casinos UK Flags Major Risks from Planned Machine Games Duty Rise
Wendy Powell · Sep 26, 2026

Genting Casinos UK Flags Major Risks from Planned Machine Games Duty Rise

Genting Casinos UK, which runs 32 venues across the country, has issued a direct warning that the Treasury's proposal to double Machine Games Duty from 20% to 40% would impose an extra £16 million in annual costs, pushing 13 of its sites into unprofitability and threatening more than 850 venue positions along with around 50 support roles. The Autumn Budget is currently weighing this adjustment, and company statements emphasize that site closures would shrink rather than expand overall Treasury receipts because lost tax from operations would outweigh any gains from the higher rate.
Breakdown of the Proposed Duty Adjustment
Under the current structure Machine Games Duty applies to gaming machines in casinos, betting shops and arcades at a flat 20% rate, yet the contemplated shift to 40% would apply uniformly and immediately affect high-volume locations first. Genting's analysis shows the added burden would concentrate on its larger properties where machine income forms a substantial share of revenue, leaving smaller or lower-traffic sites exposed to outright losses once the new rate takes effect. Observers note that the timing coincides with existing cost pressures from inflation, energy prices and prior regulatory updates that have already squeezed margins across the sector.
Employment and Operational Consequences
The company projects that 13 locations would become unsustainable, triggering direct job losses exceeding 850 in the venues themselves plus another 50 in central support functions such as finance, compliance and marketing teams. These figures reflect full-time equivalent positions and do not yet account for indirect effects on suppliers or local economies that depend on casino footfall. Genting has indicated it would have little choice but to review its entire estate footprint if the duty change proceeds without offsetting measures, because fixed costs cannot be reduced quickly enough to absorb the increase.
Alignment with Broader Industry Warnings
The Betting and Gaming Council has echoed similar concerns on behalf of its members, pointing out that the same duty rise would affect betting shops and other casino operators already navigating tighter compliance rules and rising operational expenses. Data compiled by the council shows machine gaming contributes a significant slice of total tax paid by the land-based sector, yet higher rates risk accelerating venue closures that reduce the overall tax base over time. Genting's position mirrors this pattern, with executives arguing that the Treasury would collect less net revenue once closed sites stop paying business rates, VAT and corporation tax in addition to the duty itself.

Economic Modelling and Revenue Outlook
According to the Economic modelling of potential MGD increases report published in September 2026, raising the duty to 40% produces diminishing returns once behavioral responses such as reduced player volumes and site rationalization are factored in. The study simulates several scenarios and finds that Treasury income peaks at lower rate increases before falling as operators adjust their footprints. Genting has referenced comparable internal modelling to support its claim that keeping sites open preserves a larger aggregate tax contribution than attempting to extract more from fewer locations. Industry participants continue to present these findings to policymakers ahead of final budget decisions.
Next Steps for Stakeholders
Company representatives have begun direct engagement with Treasury officials and members of parliament representing casino constituencies to outline the scale of the impact. The Betting and Gaming Council has also submitted detailed briefings that incorporate employment data and tax-flow projections. While the Autumn Budget date remains the immediate focal point, further consultations on implementation details could still occur if ministers seek to mitigate unintended effects on employment and regional economies. Observers expect additional submissions from other operators before any final rate is confirmed in the budget documentation.
Conclusion
Genting Casinos UK's assessment places the proposed Machine Games Duty increase at the center of a wider debate about sustainable taxation for the land-based gambling sector. The figures released by the operator highlight concrete risks to profitability, employment and long-term Treasury revenue, while aligning with parallel statements from the Betting and Gaming Council. As the Autumn Budget process advances, the economic modelling released in September 2026 and operator-specific impact assessments will continue to inform discussions on how any rate adjustment might be calibrated to balance fiscal objectives with sector viability.